Every year, when my birthday comes around, I find myself answering the same question in a hundred different forms. Friends ask what my plans are. Family members ask whether I feel older. Social media reminds me that another year has quietly passed, and for a day, the internet becomes unusually generous with affection. There is something undeniably beautiful about birthdays, about the small ritual of people pausing their own lives for a moment to acknowledge yours. Yet somewhere between reading messages from friends I have known for years and hearing relatives remark on how quickly time has passed, another thought always finds its way into my mind. I begin to wonder which version of me each of these people is celebrating. It seems like such an ordinary question until you sit with it for a while. Then it becomes impossible to answer. The friend who met me in university does not remember the same person as the neighbour who watched me grow up. My parents are wishing a happy birthday to someone whose first words, first fears and first disappointments they witnessed long before I was old enough to remember them myself. Someone who worked with me briefly remembers an entirely different person, one whose existence was confined to meetings, emails and hurried conversations over coffee. A stranger who asked me for directions years ago may not remember my face at all, but if the interaction happened to arrive on a particularly difficult day, perhaps they remember only that someone stopped long enough to help. None of these people are wrong. They simply know different versions of the same life.
The older I grow, the stranger this begins to feel. We spend so much of our lives trying to discover who we really are, as though somewhere beneath our habits, ambitions and contradictions there exists a singular, authentic self waiting patiently to be uncovered. Entire industries are built upon this promise. Personality tests promise to reveal our true nature. Self-help books insist that authenticity is something we can eventually arrive at if only we think deeply enough, heal sufficiently or learn to ignore the expectations of others. Even literature, despite knowing better, often seduces us into believing that every protagonist possesses an essential identity around which the story revolves. But life refuses to cooperate with this comforting fiction. The more people we meet, the more places we inhabit and the more years we accumulate, the less possible it becomes to imagine ourselves as one fixed person. We do not merely change over time; we multiply. Every meaningful relationship leaves behind another interpretation of who we are, another unfinished portrait painted from a different angle, under different light, with different memories available to the artist.
Perhaps this is why it is impossible to ever know ourselves completely. We imagine self-knowledge as an inward journey, a descent into our own thoughts and feelings, but maybe part of us has always existed outside our reach. There are things other people notice about us that we never will. They remember sentences we have forgotten saying. They attach significance to gestures that seemed insignificant when we made them. They build entire opinions around moments that barely registered in our own memory. A casual compliment that slipped out almost accidentally might become someone's favourite memory of us. An impatient remark spoken during a stressful week might define us in another person's story for years. It is unsettling to realise how little control we have over the narratives that continue living after we have walked away from them. We spend enormous amounts of energy deciding who we want to become, yet so much of our identity is assembled quietly inside other people's memories, beyond our influence and often beyond our awareness.
I sometimes think of identity less as a mirror and more as a night sky. Standing beneath it, we assume we are looking at something singular, but what appears to be one continuous expanse is actually an unimaginable collection of separate stars, each existing at its own distance, each emitting light that began travelling long before it reached us. Perhaps people are like that too. Every relationship illuminates a different part of us, and no one, not even ourselves, can ever occupy the position from which all those stars become visible at once. We mistake our private thoughts for the whole constellation simply because they are the only ones we can directly observe. Meanwhile, scattered across cities we no longer live in and conversations we barely remember having, fragments of ourselves continue shining in other people's recollections, disconnected from the person we have already become.
What makes birthdays especially strange is that they encourage exactly the opposite illusion. They ask us to imagine continuity where life has mostly consisted of revision. We celebrate becoming one year older as though the person blowing out the candles is simply an updated version of the child who once struggled to pronounce their own name. Yet anyone who has lived long enough knows that growing older rarely feels so linear. There are years that contain almost nothing except routine, and then there are months that quietly dismantle everything we thought we knew about ourselves. There are conversations after which we are no longer quite the same person. There are books that rearrange the furniture of our minds so completely that it becomes impossible to remember how we once thought. There are cities that alter our sense of possibility merely by allowing us to walk through unfamiliar streets. Love changes us. Grief changes us. Failure changes us in subtler ways than success ever can. Looking back, it becomes difficult to identify a single uninterrupted self moving steadily through time. Instead I see a succession of people, each inheriting something from the last while quietly abandoning something else.
Perhaps that is why old photographs can feel so disorienting. We like to imagine photographs preserve moments, but I suspect they preserve identities instead. Looking at a picture taken five or ten years ago, I rarely think first about where it was taken. Instead, I find myself wondering what it felt like to be that person. What occupied his mind during ordinary afternoons? What did he fear would happen? What future seemed inevitable to him? It is astonishing how quickly certainty becomes historical. There was a version of me who believed adulthood would eventually arrive as a state of confidence rather than a continuous process of improvisation. There was another who thought success would erase self-doubt instead of simply teaching it better manners. There was someone who believed that once enough questions had been answered, life would become easier to understand. Looking back now, I feel affection toward those earlier selves, but I cannot honestly claim to still be them. They survive mostly in memory, much like childhood homes that continue to exist after we have moved away.
Memory itself is a peculiar architect. It does not preserve reality so much as construct livable versions of it. We imagine our childhood friends as children long after they have become adults. We continue speaking to our grandparents in the voices we remember from decades earlier. Sometimes we discover an old teacher on social media and are surprised to find they have grown old, as though they had somehow stepped outside time while we continued ageing. The people we carry inside our minds rarely keep pace with the people they eventually become. Perhaps the same is true of us. Somewhere there is a classmate who still thinks of me exactly as I was at sixteen. Somewhere there is a colleague who remembers only the version of me who existed within the narrow boundaries of an office. Somewhere there is someone who remembers me because of a conversation I have entirely forgotten. All of these people are carrying perfectly sincere versions of me through the world, and none of those versions will ever know each other.
The philosopher William James once suggested that a person has as many social selves as there are individuals who recognise them. It is one of those ideas that initially sounds exaggerated until life slowly proves otherwise. Imagine gathering every person who has ever known you into a single room, not just family and close friends, but teachers, neighbours, classmates, strangers, old colleagues, people you travelled beside for a few hours, someone who once shared a hospital waiting room with you, someone whose life briefly intersected yours before both of you continued in different directions. Then imagine asking each of them to describe you honestly. The result would not be one portrait but hundreds, some overlapping beautifully, others contradicting each other completely. One person would describe you as confident, while another insists you are shy. Someone would remember your patience; someone else, your impatience. To one person, you arrived exactly when they needed you. To another, you disappeared too soon. Each account would contain something recognisable, yet none would feel complete. And perhaps the greatest irony is that the one description missing from that room would be the one you tell yourself every day.
That thought has become oddly comforting to me as I have grown older. When I was younger, I imagined identity as something that needed to be solved, like a difficult equation whose correct answer would eventually reveal itself through enough experience. I wanted consistency. I wanted certainty. I wanted to become the kind of person who could answer questions about himself without hesitation. Somewhere along the way, though, I realised that uncertainty is not evidence of incompleteness but of being alive. Rivers are difficult to describe precisely because they are always moving. We do not criticise seasons for refusing to remain the same. Why, then, do we expect human beings to possess a permanence that nature itself never asks of anything else? Perhaps the real tragedy is not that we fail to understand ourselves completely, but that we spend so much of our lives believing such understanding is even possible. We inherit the language of discovery very early on. We are told to “find ourselves,” as though the self were a misplaced object waiting patiently beneath the sofa of adulthood. We imagine that one day the uncertainty will end, that enough birthdays, enough heartbreaks, enough books and enough mistakes will finally converge into clarity. But the longer I live, the more I suspect that a human life is not a mystery to be solved but a conversation that never reaches its final sentence. Every year adds another paragraph without rewriting the ones that came before. We continue speaking, continue changing, continue contradicting ourselves, and somehow the unfinishedness of it all is not a flaw but the very condition of being alive.
There is another version of this thought that returns to me every birthday, one that is quieter and perhaps a little more unsettling. On the day we celebrate our own lives, we also become aware, almost accidentally, of the lives moving alongside ours. My birthday does not simply mean that I have grown another year older; it also means that my parents have grown another year older. It means the people who have loved me have spent another year carrying memories of me that I cannot access. When I was a child, birthdays felt entirely self-contained. They were measured in cakes, balloons and the exciting arithmetic of becoming a number that sounded more important than the last. Somewhere along the way, that arithmetic changed. Birthdays stopped being only about the distance from my birth and became equally about the distance from everyone else’s. Every year I become older is also another year that my mother is older than I have ever known her before. Another year in which my father quietly accumulates stories I was too busy living to notice. It is strange how age teaches us that time is never experienced alone. We move through it together, even when we imagine ourselves moving independently.
I sometimes wonder whether this is why nostalgia becomes more complicated as we grow older. It is tempting to think we miss the past because it was happier, but I don’t think that is entirely true. Many of our happiest memories contain worries we would never willingly return to. School was not easier while we were living through it. University was full of uncertainties that felt overwhelming at the time. Even childhood, that mythical paradise we spend adulthood trying to reconstruct, contained fears that seemed enormous simply because we had no larger fears with which to compare them. What we miss, perhaps, is not the past itself but the certainty that those versions of us were still possible. Every birthday quietly closes certain doors forever. Not dramatically, not with the sound of something being locked, but with the almost imperceptible silence of possibilities becoming memories before they ever had the chance to become realities.
There is a peculiar grief attached to the lives we never lived. Somewhere there exists a version of me who made different decisions, chose different cities, fell in love with different people, pursued different ambitions and became almost unrecognisable to the person writing these words today. Philosophers sometimes call this the problem of possible selves, but I have always found the phrase strangely beautiful. It suggests that every decision is also a farewell. Every yes contains within it a thousand invisible no’s. We celebrate birthdays because another year has been added to our lives, but we rarely acknowledge that another year has also removed countless futures from consideration. The older we become, the fewer versions of ourselves remain possible. And yet, paradoxically, the person we are becoming often feels more expansive than all the possibilities we have left behind. Perhaps maturity is learning that depth matters more than breadth, that one well-lived life will always contain more meaning than a thousand imagined ones.
Books have taught me this in ways ordinary life rarely can. Every memorable novel eventually leaves us with the same quiet realisation: no character ever fully understands themselves while they are living their own story. It is only the reader, looking backwards from the final page, who notices the patterns, the ironies and the invisible threads connecting seemingly unrelated moments. We are granted the privilege of hindsight over fictional lives while remaining permanently denied it in our own. Perhaps this explains why we tell stories at all. Stories create the illusion that life possesses an arc, that scattered experiences can eventually be gathered into coherence. Reality is far messier. We live forwards but understand backwards, and even that understanding remains frustratingly incomplete because there is no final chapter from which to look back. As long as we are alive, the ending continues to change the meaning of everything that came before.
Maybe this is why birthdays have begun to feel less like milestones and more like brief pauses in an ongoing conversation with time. They are among the few days each year when life asks us to stop long enough to notice that it has been happening. Most days disappear into one another with remarkable efficiency. Tuesday resembles Wednesday. One month quietly becomes another. We postpone reflection because there is always another deadline, another journey, another ordinary distraction waiting just beyond the horizon. Then suddenly a birthday arrives, carrying with it the uncomfortable insistence that another year has already become memory. We search for dramatic transformations because we assume that twelve months ought to have produced something visible. Yet the biggest changes rarely announce themselves so clearly. They exist in subtler places: in the opinions we no longer defend with the same certainty, in the people we have forgiven without realising it, in the fears that stopped governing our decisions sometime during the year without ever informing us that they had left.
I think this is why I have become less interested in asking whether I am a different person from the one who celebrated this day last year. The more interesting question is whether I have become a kinder observer of that earlier self. It is surprisingly difficult to extend compassion backwards through time. We judge our younger selves for their naïveté while forgetting that ignorance is simply another name for having not yet lived long enough. We cringe at old opinions without appreciating that certainty often precedes wisdom. We laugh at dreams that never materialised, forgetting that every meaningful ambition once looked unrealistic to someone. Looking back with gentleness may be one of the most overlooked forms of maturity. After all, the people we used to be were doing the best they could with the lives they had experienced up until that point. None of us arrives fully formed. We become ourselves through countless revisions, and every earlier draft deserves a little gratitude for carrying us this far.
So this year, as another birthday quietly arrives, I find myself thinking less about age than about inheritance. Not the inheritance of money or possessions, but of memories. Somewhere in the world, there are people carrying moments of my life that I no longer possess. Someone remembers a conversation I have forgotten. Someone remembers a kindness that felt ordinary to me. Someone remembers a version of me that disappeared years ago without my noticing. I like to imagine those memories travelling through the world independently of me, becoming small parts of other people’s stories in the same way that their memories have quietly become part of mine. Perhaps this is what it means to belong to a community rather than merely exist alongside one another. We spend our lives exchanging fragments of ourselves until no life remains entirely private.
And maybe that is the answer to the question that returns every birthday. Which version of me are people celebrating? The answer, of course, is all of them, and none of them. They are celebrating the child who no longer exists except in photographs, the awkward teenager who believed adulthood would explain everything, the young man who is still learning that certainty is overrated, and the person I have not yet become but am already, invisibly, moving toward. They are celebrating a life that cannot be reduced to any single memory because it has always existed as a conversation between who I believe myself to be and who others have experienced me as. I will never meet the person everyone else thinks they know. That version of me exists only in the space between hundreds of different memories, stitched together from moments I have forgotten and gestures I never knew mattered.
Oddly enough, I no longer find that sad. There is something profoundly liberating about accepting that no one, not even ourselves, gets the complete picture. Perhaps completeness was never the goal. Perhaps a human life is meant to remain slightly unfinished, open to reinterpretation, capable of surprising even the person living it. On a birthday, we are often tempted to measure our lives by what we have achieved, what we have accumulated or how closely we resemble the person we once hoped to become. But tonight, I think I would rather measure my life by something gentler: the number of conversations that changed me, the books that quietly rearranged my thinking, the people who made me feel seen, and the small moments in which I unknowingly became part of someone else’s memory.
If that is all a life finally is, a collection of borrowed moments, carried differently by everyone we meet, then perhaps birthdays are not celebrations of becoming older at all. Perhaps they are quiet acknowledgements that, for another year, we have continued leaving pieces of ourselves in the lives of others, while carrying pieces of them within our own. And that feels like a beautiful way to grow older. Not by becoming one definitive person, but by becoming, little by little, someone who exists in many stories at once, even if the only one we can never read in its entirety is our own.
❤️❤️